PSE studied a variety of alternatives such as reducing demand through continued conservation, increasing the capacity of PSE’s existing electric transmission lines, generating energy locally, and building new infrastructure. For more information about the alternatives studied, visit. Read the solutions report and the non-wires solutions analysis to learn more about alternatives that were analyzed.īoth Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process studied project alternatives. We studied whether the Eastside’s electrical needs could be addressed with other alternatives rather than building new infrastructure. We've looked at many ways to solve the Eastside's electrical problem. ![]() After a comprehensive review, PSE and independent experts determined that a combination of continued conservation and infrastructure upgrades – a new substation and higher capacity transmission lines – is the best way to reliably meet the Eastside’s growing energy needs. PSE’s planners and engineers analyzed a variety of approaches to address the Eastside’s growing energy needs, including reducing demand through conservation, increasing the capacity of our existing transmission lines, generating energy locally, and building new infrastructure.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |